The rational man

This book had some interesting observations. specially regarding female imperatives. the argument is social design is evolve in a way that is insanely optimized for the women’s and mans should be considered privileged to play the part in it. they call it a matrix. may be because women are so good at playing the pretend game innocently in a courteous manner.

the idea that just being women itself put them in the place of the prize. they don’t have to do anything. and it should be considered an honor for man if they choose them. this doesn’t sound like a fair game. because of this so obvious agreement women can choose between many man. shit test them. cheat them and it will be considered ok. because they are in-charge ( ofcourse they have to do it in innocently in a courteous manner. ) but a man even flirting while in a pseudo relationship would be considered extremely wrong ( because they are direct in their conversation ).

so what exactly makes women a prize. one is plain social conditioning. the second is sex and the idea of love. and by default being good in playing this deceitful game. where they always say right thing ( we want honest authentic guy while having face full of makeup, wearing insane shoes, hair that tooks hours to style….. ). interestingly it is the mans who could understand these so called signals without confronting, considered as gentlemen. paradoxically these mans are driven by the temptation of reward of having sex and love, if they behave like this. a pretty good system isn’t it.

if we take a look objectively ( oh that’s an offense to women but fine for men. ). on subconscious level, what exactly women want and have to offer. the main asset for women is sex and idea of love. and being the weaker gender. they want protection. and if they could afford, choices. then their is control of depriveated